LF Decentralized Trust logo with a background of glowing interconnected nodes, symbolizing the networked structure of decentralized technologies.
Monday, 17.09, marks an exciting milestone for decentralized technologies with the official launch of the LF Decentralized Trust by the Linux Foundation. This new initiative is kicking off with over 100 founding members and promises to drive innovation in blockchain, decentralized identities, smart contracts, and more. But what exactly is this trust, and why is it so important for the future of technology?
We have an entire video covering the LF Decentralized Trust. You can watch it here:
How does the LF Decentralized Trust work?
The LF Decentralized Trust is a collaborative effort that brings together a global community of experts and organizations to work on decentralized technologies. These technologies enable systems to interact directly without relying on a central authority, offering more transparency, security, and control.
By focusing on areas like blockchain, decentralized identities, and cryptographic tools, the trust aims to create open-source solutions that industries across finance, healthcare, and government can adopt for more secure and transparent operations.
Why Decentralization Matters
In today’s digital world, industries are rapidly moving towards decentralized systems. Whether for Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) or national digital infrastructures, the need for neutral and secure systems is growing.
Technologies like zero-knowledge proofs, multi-party computation, and tokenization offer game-changing potential. By enabling interactions without a single controlling entity, these innovations ensure that systems remain open and accessible for future generations.
Open Governance and Vendor Neutrality in the Trust
One of the core principles of the LF Decentralized Trust is its focus on open governance and vendor neutrality. This means that everyone involved has a say in how the technologies are developed, and no single company or organization can dominate. This way we can ensure that the technologies remain flexible and trustworthy, which is crucial for long-term projects like CBDCs and national infrastructures.
Expanding on the Hyperledger Foundation’s Work
The Linux Foundation Decentralized Trust builds on the foundations laid by the Hyperledger Foundation and other Linux Foundation projects. With over 17 Hyperledger projects focused on real-world applications, this new initiative will further expand decentralized technologies’ reach across multiple industries.
Why The LF Decentralized Trust Matters for Your Industry
As more companies and governments adopt decentralized technologies, the opportunities for open-source collaboration will only grow. Whether in finance, healthcare, supply chain, or retail, decentralization offers a future of transparent, secure, and scalable systems.
In many cities where space is limited and vertical construction is common, the cost of low-altitude airspace can skyrocket. Air rights deals, which involve selling unused development rights from one property owner to another, are typically associated with major developers. However, due to the proximity of buildings, even homeowners, small building owners, and co-op boards can participate in these transactions. Despite their potential profitability, these deals used to be very complex. A US start-up, SkyTrade, aims to change this by building a marketplace for these rights.
We are joined by the SkyTrade’s Co-Founders. CEO Jonathan Dockrell, and CTO Marcin Zduniak, will introduce us to their pioneering platform that promises to democratise the air rights market.
SkyTrade Co-founders: CEO Jonathan Dockrell (left) and CTO Marcin Zduniak (right) Source: SkyTrade
Real estate air rights and their worth
Espeo Software: Jonathan, what are air rights, and how much are they worth?
Jonathan: Air rights are the right to control and use the airspace above a property. This concept dates back to Roman times when land ownership was considered from “Heaven to Hell.” Today, air rights exist in all jurisdictions, though their attributes and ownership can vary.
In many countries like the US and UK, air rights are vested in the landowner. This means the owner can use, trade, sell, or rent these rights. They can even transfer them to another location to add value elsewhere. The value of air rights can range from 5-20% of the land value, sometimes trading for more than £350 per cubic foot. For example, real estate valued at £10M could see an increase of up to £2M by utilising air rights through SkyTrade. SkyTrade makes this traditionally opaque market accessible and valuable to a wider audience.
Espeo Software: What is SkyTrade?
Jonathan: SkyTrade is an air rights marketplace that enables real estate owners of all sizes to monetise their airspace. We connect air rights owners with airspace users, often commercial drone entities needing permission to operate below 400 feet. Without this permission, drones are trespassing, so they rent airspace through SkyTrade.
Additionally, real estate developers and traders use SkyTrade to buy, transfer, or hold air rights for their current and future value.
SkyTrade’s website, above the fold. Source: SkyTrade
Airspace trading options with SkyTrade
Espeo Software: In which regions is airspace trading currently possible with SkyTrade? Where do you expect it to expand?
Jonathan: Airspace can be traded in regions like the USA, UK, Canada, Australia and Ireland, where decentralised individual landownership is supported by law. In other countries, like Spain, Germany, and Poland, where the legal system is based on civil law, the government typically owns air rights. For these regions, we offer the governments a marketplace for trading their air rights.
Espeo Software: Why would property owners or investors be interested in claiming airspace? Will the adoption of air rights trading generally increase?
Jonathan: Property owners are interested in claiming air rights as the use of them, even to trade without being built into, adds capital value to their real estate holdings. Investors are interested in their returns from real estate growth or, if they are investors in unmanned aerial vehicles (drone companies), their investments can finally scale as the drones have legal permission to fly.
Espeo Software: Do you have plans to expand to other jurisdictions, such as the European Union?
Jonathan: Yes, we are actively engaging with real estate companies and officials in the EU to monetise air rights and create income for municipalities, their communities and real estate investors. We welcome interest from anyone in the EU.
SkyTrade Airspace Trading with Blockchain
Espeo Software: Could you describe the process of how airspace is traded using blockchain technology? Why is blockchain technology necessary for trading airspace?
Marcin: Air rights are traded on the blockchain through our Auction House contract. This functions similarly to a traditional auction house, where items are listed and investors bid to win. The highest bid secures the auction.
Blockchain technology enables the trade of digital assets, such as air rights and flying/rental permissions. The primary benefits are fair, objective, and transparent price discovery. Furthermore, people have the flexibility to choose their preferred trading venues and price discovery algorithms, not just our Auction House. They can use alternative platforms if they wish, as these are their air-rights assets.
Understanding Smart Contracts with Espeo Software’s Blockchain Expert
We asked our Senior Solutions Consultant, Agnieszka Niedzielska-Hołownia about the technical side of smart contracts, the technology behind auction house contracts built by SkyTrade.
Agnieszka Hołownia-Niedzielska, Senior Solutions Consultant at Espeo Software
Espeo Software: What exactly is a smart contract, and how is it different from traditional contracts?
Agnieszka: A smart contract is a computer program that runs on a blockchain. It automates and executes processes transparently and verifiably, eliminating manual intervention. Unlike traditional contracts, it immutably saves every transaction on the network to ensure security and trust. Brilliant, isn’t it?
Espeo Software: Are smart contracts legally binding?
Agnieszka:: Smart contracts can be legally binding, depending on their purpose. For example, purchasing a subscription online is legally binding, while buying real estate typically requires a specific legal procedure. Monetising airspace through blockchain is a legally binding use case.
Espeo Software: Are smart contracts a popular tool?
Agnieszka: Yes, smart contracts are becoming increasingly popular. They enable machine-to-machine communication in smart homes, cars, watches, and UAVs. Automation boosts efficiency, allowing people to focus on non-repetitive tasks, and offers companies a reliable, up-to-date source of truth. These benefits make smart contracts invaluable as the language of blockchain.
Espeo Software: Can you provide examples of common use cases for smart contracts from recent years?
Agnieszka: Smart contracts are vital to blockchain, crypto, and DeFi projects. They facilitate payment reconciliation and international money transfers in projects like Onyx by JP Morgan and Ripple. Serving as a single source of truth, they enable data extraction from the blockchain, as seen in BurstIQ, where they ensure the ownership and secure use of medical data.
In Decentralized Finance (DeFi) apps, smart contracts automatically trade, compare, and validate transactions, often involving multiple tokens, and execute transactions when conditions are met.
To learn more about the air rights market visit the SkyTrade Website, explore their platform, and see if you’re eligible to list, buy, or trade your airspace.
*Disclaimer: Espeo Software does not endorse or promote any specific investments, products, or services mentioned in this article. The information provided is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be considered financial, legal, or investment advice. Always conduct your research and consult with a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Espeo Software is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided in this article.
Agnieszka Hołownia-Niedzielska, author of the article and Senior Solutions Consultant at Espeo Software
In the modern-day digital landscape, consortia and corporate platforms face numerous challenges. These include managing complexity, enhancing collaboration, and improving transparency. This article focuses on addressing them using distributed ledger technology (DLT). Power relations, coopetition within consortia, data security, and privacy in decentralized architectures will be the topic of examination.
How to leverage distributed ledger technology in corporate platforms and consortia
Distributed Ledger Technology has wide uses. Sectors like settlements and supply chain management continue to leverage it. Logistics use blockchain to track production and delivery processes, prevent food fraud, and verify product origin. It also helps verify transportation conditions, validate expiry dates, and confirm eco-certificates.
How blockchain can address challenges faced by consortia
Operating across companies requires considerations around cost division, compromising needs, and managing relationships without a chain of command. Despite many unknowns that characterize building and organizing consortia, the business case that stakeholders want to work on remains the same. They will be looking for similar benefits. That’s why creating a list of benefits and presenting them to internal stakeholders is important. This shift could have significant implications for all workers. It can lead to increased automation, greater independence from a central unit, and higher accountability. With a more process-oriented approach, organizations can expect better-structured processes, but also better data quality. This could lead to less confusion and more organized cross-company systems.
Ecosystems based on DLT, blockchain, or other decentralized architectures are maturing. More companies now look beyond innovation and publicity. Instead, they focus on tangible business cases. Use cases of these consortia are likely to impact workers not directly involved in software development and tech, such as those in accounting and settlements. By automating repetitive tasks, these technologies allow specialists to focus on expert tasks, reducing mistakes and streamlining processes.
The power within blockchain consortia is distributed differently from that of large centralized platform providers. Blockchain implementation operates independently of the organizational or legal framework. However, its decentralized nature means that each participant owns a full copy of the data, rather than a single central unit that has to be monitored or widely trusted.
Interactions in corporate platforms – a four-phase trajectory
The interaction between various companies involved in such platform projects always has specific characteristics, but it could be streamlined into a four-phase course.
The first phase involves innovators, often CIOs driven by personal interest, who identify a persistent problem. It could be resolved by standardizing the process across companies with blockchain technology.
Later, the initiating company experiencing the issue reaches out to interested parties in other business units. This usually happens after many companies have dealt with the same problem for years.
In the third phase of the process, business owners from one or more companies work together. Occasionally, the tech and legal departments also get involved. Usually, the ones in control of the project consult internally with multiple stakeholders. They then work on a solution acceptable to all businesses.
Finally, the proposed solution is built into a Minimum Viable Product (MVP) or Proof of Concept (PoC) version. It’s then beta-tested, feedback is collected, and the solution gains momentum. Some companies might wish to join only as participants, while the majority prefers to join as nodes to own their copy of data.
Conditions for a Successful distributed ledger technology Project
Maintaining relationships within DLT consortia requires some vital work. Mainly, it’s a key to managing tasks well and organizing things, keeping people on different levels informed. Those managing consortia projects need to consider differences between participants and the number of departments and workers engaged. It’s crucial to understand that processes and roles may differ. As a consequence, the people engaged in the project may change. Depending on the consortium’s participants, the structure of the internal process can also vary.
Also, although blockchain communication is secure, establishing connections between nodes built in different organizations requires careful consideration of IT policies. Some of them may need adjustments. The team may modify the project’s technical side according to needs. In an ideal scenario, all participants have their node, transforming IT solution consumers into “vendors”.
Gathering feedback regularly is also a success factor. Feedback from early adopters – a group of pilot companies – plays a vital role, especially during usability tests. What’s important to note is that this work isn’t done when the first version of the solution is in operation. Collecting lessons learned after the MVP phase is a method to implement agile adjustments successfully.
However, not all blockchain projects succeed. Some fail because they don’t grow big enough, so they don’t get their momentum. Some people treat consortia projects as internal, resulting in a lack of external communication and adaptability. This creates a restrictive ‘our way is the only way’ mentality. Moreover, implementing change always presents a challenge.
Despite some disappointments, distributed ledger technology consortia and structures keep offering benefits. This could be savings, or utility (paying more but gaining a single, independent source of truth). Developers build these structures in an agile manner, adding new participants and features, and planning for the next steps in the decentralization process. The key is to ensure that end-users actively use these projects; they don’t remain just as ideas hidden in a drawer.
Our distributed ledger technology business case: HLB Global
It’s time to analyze a real-world application, a case study of HLB Global. HLB is a global network of independent advisory and accounting firms. They have independent branches across 157 countries with more than 38 000 professionals, combining local expertise and global capabilities.
Espeo Software created a decentralized system to let members interact with each other more easily. HLB wanted to standardize and clarify its referral processes. They wanted everyone to play by the same rules enforced by the system. With the ability to add new referrals in place via the existing SharePoint interface, it’s now easier for everyone to manage their tasks. To track deal statuses, data is gathered from various sources like project orders, invoices, and payments. We had to build trust into the solution.
We used Hyperledger Fabric, a private blockchain network, as the solution. Users within this network operate in a transparent and secure environment. The system tracks and permanently records every action, ensuring it’s tamper-proof. The permissioned nature of HLF allows only authorized participants to gain access, maintaining the integrity and confidentiality of the blockchain network.
The HLF blockchain network now stores the data. It serves as the one source of truth with immutable data history. We also automated status changes that follow the execution of chain code tasks.
About this article
Espeo Software’s Solutions Consultant, Agnieszka Hołownia-Niedzielska, was invited by Prof. Dr. Ulrich Klüh to share her expertise on a Coopetition in Corporate Platforms project. The Darmstadt Business School conducts the research project, with funding from the Hans Böckler Foundation.
About Agnieszka Hołownia-Niedzielska:
Agnieszka Hołownia-Niedzielska is a Senior Solutions Consultant at Espeo Software. She has over a decade of experience in FinTech and RegTech product development and project management. Having been a business owner herself, she brings unique insights into business and technical analysis across various project sizes. She acquired Blockchain for Business Professional certification.
Team working on blockchain technology. Connecting a large cube
Future Technology Concept Blockchain Cryptocurrency. isometric vector illustration.
You may be fascinated by blockchain technology, hearing about all those ground-breaking projects, and thinking about bringing it to your organization.
But some questions should pile up:
What is the right case to start the blockchain project?
Will it work for my organization?
Will the blockchain network work as a part of my product?
If you have worked in the business for some years, you probably know there are rarely simple yes or no answers to the questions. Having said that, if the idea is: let’s take any relational database and change it into a blockchain network, the response in 99,9% of cases is: “no”.
Let’s take together six steps to assess six aspects that help indicate if the organization is ready for the blockchain project.
Here are the steps:
Consortium
Company organizational complexity
Database vs blockchain
Trendsetter or follower
One source of truth
If… then…
And then as a bonus topic, we will mention the easiest way to decide between a public and a private network.
Blockchain supports consortia
A consortium is a way for businesses to join forces and reach goals they can not reach by themselves. In a consortium, trust needs to be gained, so it’s beneficial when the technology guarantees transparency and follows the rules. A distributed ledger is a way to achieve that.
What is essential, in consortium there is no typical hierarchy, and, thanks to blockchain, equality is also maintained on the data level. Each participant has the same rights to read and write information and has the right to monitor the actions of other participants – blockchain nodes are equal, and the data history is transparent.
There are situations where not all data should be shared between all participants. Selected groups within the consortium may exchange data only between them. It is also one of the enterprise-friendly features of the Hyperledger Fabric network.
Handle complexity with blockchain
Complex technical and organizational structures are complicated and sometimes almost impossible to unify. There is no need for that with blockchain. Blockchain network nodes operate in local environments, while data consistency and immutability are ensured globally.
That is often the case for enterprise companies, which have 100+ branches worldwide and face troubles with managing internal processes engaging many departments.
This complexity of structure and independence of branches may be a way to obtain local auditability and accountability. Each of the separate organizational units follows local compliance standards and is responsible for its data. In the case the database is centralized there is a unit being the global data owner, and that can result in an additional organizational burden and an increased risk factor.
Blockchain or database is a go-to solution depending on the business case
Answering “yes” to the following questions is a good indicator to start using blockchain:
Are data integrity and a tamper-proof solution crucial for the project?
Does each member need their own copy of the data?
Does every reader and writer require a transparent and easily accessible data history?
Should data be processed automatically according to agreement terms enforced independently?
The “yes” answers you gave specify features that get many blockchain projects going.
Positive answering to the following questions is a good indicator that the centralized database should be used:
Is a single entity responsible for the data, and is it controlling dataflow?
Are data performance and data search the core of the system?
Does each participant exchange data only with the central party?
Do large quantities of graphics, movies, and other non-transactional data need to be stored?
Notice that question 4 is tricky. The answer may be yes for the tokenization process, and you still use blockchain with the support of IPFS technology, for instance.
Generally, if you said yes to some questions from the second section, analyze all other aspects presented in the article to decide if blockchain or other technology is what your project needs.
Blockchain is used by trendsetters and followers
For trendsetters, a blockchain project is a way to differentiate themselves and be one step ahead of competitors – enterprise blockchain with a mature ecosystem is a great way to be bold and to get momentum before others in the industry. Blockchain technology brings value by, to mention a few, work automation, reducing intermediaries, and providing transparency. This is why being the first to start a DLT project is not about getting good publicity, but it doesn’t hurt.
Followers are the companies that implement what others in the industry tested and succeeded in. Even if the company is very cautious toward new trends, it is still aware of the need to follow modern technological trends. There are multiple blockchain projects in various industries, and understanding use cases in yours is a way to get battle-tested blockchain benefits for your use.
Undisputable data state gives blockchain network an upper hand
Dealing with multiple data sources from numerous stakeholders is a common issue – blockchain creates one immutable and trusted source of information for everyone, removing the need for a third-party intermediary.
In other words, a blockchain network is suitable for systems with no obvious authority or hierarchy between parties. However, there is a demand for one reliable source of information. Without clear authority, errors and omissions are hard to track, and establishing responsibility for updating data can be tricky. Blockchain creates a transparent ledger of all changes, hence data can not be altered or added arbitrarily without other parties knowing. If there is a need for the update it is clear who should be the one to add the new version. There is also no way to hide the time and date of the change.
Blockchain provides process execution in the data storage
Blockchain stores data, but it is also programmable, so to simplify: where there are if… then… rules, the chaincode (blockchain program) may deal with them. Smart contracts (blockchain-run programs) are as transparent as the network so that all participants can audit them.
Another significant change is that rules and agreements can be automatically executed and enforced. Agreements always have a risk level, and sides accept the risks or look for intermediaries to grant rules enforcement – blockchain smart contracts mitigate the risk due to the rules execution by independent technology.
Bonus: which network to choose
There is a big chance that having started to read about blockchain use cases and analyzing if that is something your organization is ready to work with, you heard about public and private blockchains. And regarding this aspect, I would risk a statement that you are in one of the three groups:
That seems clear, there are some advantages of my preferred kind of network and I need to dig into it
I know for sure which blockchain type is suitable for me
No, not yet another thing to discover
If you are in the third group, look below, it can be that simple. If you are in groups 1 or 2, you may do that just to double-check.
First, a good blockchain company won’t let you choose the wrong kind of network; their reliability and business relationship are at stake.
Secondly, private blockchain networks, like Hyperledger Fabric, are a go-to solution for enterprise blockchain projects. They are built with corporate policies and internal regulations in mind. Moreover, when corporate data require secure storage within the organization – private permissioned blockchains are prepared for that. They identify and accept each network member before sharing the data.
Do you know if you are ready for the blockchain project?
Analyzing aspects of the use case against readiness for the blockchain project isn’t a simple task, but there is a group of indicators if the blockchain can bring value to your idea. I presented 6 of them with descriptions. I hope they helped you assess the general blockchain or non-blockchain direction.
Feel free to contact Espeo Blockchain to discuss your specific case. You can also dig deeper into the topic with our other blog posts:
We use cookies to optimize our website and our service.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show personalized ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.